A private firm reviewed 2020 ballots, 2 Pa county hard drives.

0

[ad_1]


One of those counties asked that company, Speckin Forensics, for a review. It’s the latest development in a years-long effort to discredit Pennsylvania’s result.


  • Sam Dunklau

Gene J. Puskar/AP Photo

FILE PHOTO: Ballots are counted at the Allegheny County Electoral Division warehouse, north of Pittsburgh, Friday, Nov. 6, 2020.

A Michigan-based forensics firm said it examined 2020 election materials in two counties in Pennsylvania.

In a pair of reports released earlier this month, Speckin Forensics said it reviewed scans of ballots and tally sheets of Allegheny County. He also said that it took “forensic imagesof six hard drives from decertified election machines in Fulton County — at the county’s request.

The commissioners said in a legal deposit that they hired Speckin as part of “due diligence”. another company Called Wake TSI surveyed Fulton County election materials early last year, but that review turned up nothing that would alter past election results. State Senate Republicans wanted yet another company to probing the election machinery there in Januarybut the Pennsylvania Supreme Court halted that effort.

An Allegheny County spokesperson said its Board of Elections was unaware that Speckin was reviewing ballots and tally sheets until his report was released at a September 20 meeting. The documents had been made public shortly after the 2020 election through a right to know request.

On his websiteSpeckin describes itself as an “international forensic company” that specializes in a host of investigative techniques, such as “ink dating”, examining “shoe and tire prints” and “criminalistics cell phones”.

One of the company’s experts, Erich Speckin, said he participated in a review in Arizona, who has been discredited as not adhering to professional auditing protocols. Speckin also appeared on a right wing podcast in which he claims to show “proof that they stole your voice”.

Several experts and audits proved the 2020 election results in Pennsylvania to be accurate.

But for nearly two years, allies of former President Donald Trump, a Republican-led Senate committeeand private companies tried to unearth evidence of widespread problems.

Speckin Forensics said it found anomalies in the election materials it reviewed, but does not claim that any of its findings indicate fraud or malfeasance.

The company’s Fulton County report highlights some activity on the hard drives analyzed, but does not explain that such activity is part of normal computer operation. His Allegheny County report points to “image quality” issues with some of the ballots he reviewed, but acknowledges that he should review all “700,000 ballots” to determine if this discovery means something.

According State Lawcounties are only required to keep records of an election for two years.

Allegheny County leaders rebutted the image quality finding at its Elections Committee meeting this month.

The state department and the US Department of Justice warned against letting third-party companies like Speckin probe election materials, citing security risks and potential violations of election law.


[ad_2]
Source link

Share.

Comments are closed.